Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Dreamer of Dune, a review

 So ... Dreamer of Dune by Brian Herbert. My "book report."

It's an interesting read. I did not take notes while going through it, but I did dog-ear some pages where there were things I found ... interesting.
It tells Brian's version of his Dad's life, intertwining with it the story of how he became a writer as well.
Given that some of the revelations about their relationship are ... severe, but also described as in no way all-revealing, I think it reveals a son with deep-seated issues with his father.
Some of it is actually a little odd.
He will write about an event that happened in his father's life, and then tie it to some thing in his father's books, almost all of the citations from Dune books. But he never has a quote mark around any of these "connections" he draws, so it makes me think that they are his conclusions, not something his father would agree are conscious connections.
You have to ask yourself if Frank is as bad as some of the things suggest, or actually worse, but Brian doesn't want to unveil THAT much about himself.
It is structured basically in chronological order. The connection he doesn't make, which seems absurdly obvious to me after reading the tales of Frank's youth, is why Frank wrote main characters in his science fiction who had no real friends growing up. Who were trained and befriended by the adults in their life. Those characters being both Paul and Leto and even Farad 'n.
It's because Frank grew up that way. He had his own little sailboat and sailed off from Oregon to Alaska one summer. His parents were not great folks, both alcoholics, so they barely noticed. Frank had to take care of his younger siblings.
Some of the writing, particularly in the very beginning of the book, seems almost elementary school level. Sentences with exclamations points for emphasis. He has a tendency to overuse "halcyon" in referring back to the days of Frank's youth.
His style settles down but he goes back to the halcyon well often, and throws in some exclamation points. (It's OK when you are quoting someone yelling. Unnecessary for the author in a description.
Later on in the book, when Frank has suggested that Brian try journaling as a way getting all his thoughts down about a day and to get insight into his life, the latter half of the book can be reduced to an almost day-by-day listing of what restaurant Brian and his wife met Frank and Brian's mother Beverly for dinner and what wine they had. Or what wine they took out of Frank's wine cellar.
Wine is a big deal.
If you believe everything that Brian writes about Frank you have to come to the conclusion that Frank was not a nice man. IF you think that the X amount Brian reveals might be a sign that it was worse than X, Frank might have no redeeming qualities other than his writing.
The book is an homage, not to Frank, but to Bev, which is a bit odd. It really doesn't show many cases of Beverly being a great mom to either of her boys, and certainly doesn't show her once intervening with Frank on behalf of either of the boys. She never took their side.
And there were times when she definitely should have. When Brian was a kid, Frank demanded absolute silence in the house while he played his music records or tape recordings of music (reel to reel) and worked on his writing. If there was any noise, he would come out, angry and there would be some kind of discipline.
It never explicitly says that there was corporal punishment or extreme physical abuse. But Brian makes it clear that he would do anything to not get in trouble with his father.
The extreme example of this "discipline" was Frank used some kind of dime-store lie-detector kit on his children whenever he was trying to figure out who had offended.
Brian doesn't say that the test was junk science or even that his father used it wrong. He just says that his father asked questions in such a way that someone was always guilty of something, and not always the actual guilty party.
That's abusive to me. But the odd take is that Brian uses it to show how Frank was kind of like the Truthsayers of the Bene Gesserit in his book Dune.
Those are the often odd kinds of connections he makes. And he can go for chapters just relating the next few things in Frank's life and you think these comparisons and connections will cease. But they keep coming back.
It is a much talked about part of Frank's wife that he took care of his wife as she was dying of cancer. Brian goes into much detail about this, and you see, when she has gone, that his wife was not just the main person Frank talked to about his work and his first "editor" of any major work.
Beverly was coddling Frank. She handled all his fan correspondence and paid all the bills, even though he continually made financial decisions without consulting her. So despite probably being one of the most successful sci-fi authors of all time, and indeed bumping of into to a much higher tax bracket, the Herberts were living royalty payment to royalty payment basically their whole married life. He had trouble with paying child support to his first wife and he owed the IRS a ton.
But she in her will laid out a "plan" for the family to come together after her death. It is written by Brian to suggest Bev wanted everyone taken care of. It really shows that she was wanting everyone to take care of Frank after she died. She didn't want him alone.
She was called a "white witch" (like the Bene Gesserit Sisters in his father's book, Dune -- yes, he makes that connection) and could predict things that came true in some form or another. And she predicted she would die in a foreign land (turned out to be Hawaii) and she predicted that Frank would meet and fall in love with a younger woman after Bev died. Which also was true.
The way Brian writes about his father's affections after his wife's death, you wonder what he really feels. He said there were three women that Frank was interested in, just a few months after his wife's passing. He thought there was one above the rest, but it takes another chapter before he reveals that yeah, the young publicist was indeed the object of his affections, and indeed Frank's third wife in short order.
The gap between the revelation and the naming makes it seem like a literary "dun dun dunnnnn" moment.
But again, since it was OK with Bev, it was OK with Frank. And Brian doesn't really express much objection to it.
The story of the son and the father was they had a very "strained" childhood. Brian left as soon as he was old enough, to work in the insurance business. Frank was apparently a bigger jerk to his gay son, Bruce. But at some point they began, at Bevevrly's urging, to try to have a relationship when Brian was an adult. And that mostly worked.
Except when it didn't. There was one instance where Frank was yelling at one of Brian's kids for making noise or something when Frank was trying to work. In other words, treating Brian's kids the way he had treated Brian.
If I'd had the relationship with my father that Brian had had, there's no way I wouldn't have exploded on my father and probably cut him off completely for treating my kid that way. Brian never makes that big leap. He does tell his father off once. But he apologizes to him later on.
A couple of things I didn't dog-ear but I thought were very interesting revelations.
At one point, Frank made sure that all his kids got signed copies of Dune, and at this stage in Frank's life, Brian had never read any of his father's books. I can't remember why they were being encouraged to read Frank's stuff, but Brian makes a point to say he avoided reading Dune and his favorite book by his father was his first novel, Dragon under the Sea.
The two's relationship got "better" when Brian started writing.
"Let's talk story," was the code Brian suggests they developed for when Frank wanted to see what Brian was working on and offer suggestions.
Some of his early criticisms read to me like criticisms that could be laid at the door of his expanded universe Dune novels. And they are lines that are repeated about Brian's later works, specifically his parts of Man of Two Worlds, the novel the two of them worked on together (another part of Bev's plan, the two needed to work together).
Except for those early parts, it's basically well written. Though I could do without the list of restaurants and wines that it seems to be at times.
On the whol controversy over Denis Villlaneuve's comments about Frank writing Dune Messiah to correct a mistaken reception to Paul by readers, there's nothing in the book on this point. Not specifically detailed.
There's just one sentence that might be on point. "But he had important messages he wanted to convey and there had been so much misunderstanding over Dune Messiah."
At times he makes it seem like each novel came as its own thing, though he does say some of Messiah and Children of Dune were written before Dune was laid down in its current form.
Other times he makes it seem like a trilogy was envisioned from the beginning. There is another sentence just two sentences before the one above, however, that probably answers it. "Readers and editors were clamoring for more Dune stories and he had to give them what they wanted, what they expected to a certain point. He had to write for a particular market, after all."
Later, Brian writes in the chapter Miracles, "Dad had intended to end the dune series with Children of Dune, which he saw as the completion of a cycle. But the characters and settings he had created would not die."
Brian spends a lot of time talking about his fear of flying, something that kept him separated from his sick mother when she was dying.
He ells of two instances where he almost got the courage up to fly, but he talks himself out of it once, and he is talked out of it the other. The other being the time when she did die. SHe was in in a coma.
"I was only a little heartened when dd assured me she was in no pain at the end."
Frank told both his sons that they didn't need to fly out to see her, as she dind't want "a big death bed scene."
"I learned later aht in her last days my mother had remarked, "I wish Brian were here." It is a tragedy that I was not there and I think I shall always suffer for it."
Lastly, on Frank's later evaluation of Brian's writing (this is not about his writing as a whole but on a couple of sections of Man of Two Worlds they were working on.)
"He concurred with almost all of my recommendations but said I was too expository in on occasion, that I should leave more to the imagination of the reader."
I think that is a criticism of a lot of the prequels, certainly many that I have read. I know Hunters and Sandworms and the Butlerian Jihad books are this way. I can't remember, it's been so long, if the House Prelude books are this way as well.
Lastly, I think one of the things I think is important is how one thing is characterized, and what is left out.
The ONLY mention of the Dune Encyclopedia is a mention of the title, it coming out about the time of the Dune movie, lumped in with things like the Dune Coloring book and the IDune Activity,the Dune Activity & Coloring Book (apparently different things), the Art of Dune, The Dune Pop-up Panorama Book, The Making of Dune.
He completely mischaracterizes and minimizes the Encyclopedia by describing it as a "speculative compendium about the worlds of Dune."
What's left out is he doesn't mention the love his father lavished on the work, even if just in its introduction.
And he doesn't make any mention of his father donating his papers to Cal-State Fullerton, or of the person that made that donation possible. I started my read of the book looking at the index. And I didn't see a citation for Willis MacNelly.
Willis, if you read other's accounts, was Frank's best friend. He is listed in some media accounts as the person who gave Frank's eulogy.
Brian goes into lavish details of Beverly's memorial services and how her ashes were to be spread at her Hawaiian beach home property, the music that is played.
This is ostensibly a book about Frank, yet there's not much detail of the arrangements for Frank. His death and arrangements (digging a tree and scattering some ashes, an Irish wake afterward) are scattered on a couple of pages, while he devotes almost a full chapter to his mother.
If indeed Frank requested that his friend Willis give his eulogy, that is a very important omission.
Brian makes a point to say repeated that another man was his father's "best friend."
That man is definitely Frank's oldest friend, a friend from his youth who was still in his life.
But Willis? Apparently they were very close as adults in the same field. Willis was a professor of English literature with a focus in science fiction.
If you believe everything that Brian writes about his father, you could walk away being justified in thinking him a complete bastard who really only cared about his work and his second wife. He took great care of his second wife, but he just wasn't a nice man on any regular basis to anyone else.
You have to wonder that if the things that divided Brian from his father in their youth, which were still popping up as Frank's life wound down, how could he say this man was his best friend?
His mother's detailed plans for how to handle Frank after her death involved as much of the family coming together and living, almost like in a family compound, surrounding Frank and taking care of his needs. Brian was put in charge of his finances and business (not his literary estate, per se). His daughter from his first marriage was put in charge of handling correspondence. They were all supposed to be living in and around Frank with him in Seattle, but the Hawaii house was to be kept for the family.
But Frank? Other than her encouraging him to get closer to everyone and finishing Chapterhouse and writing a book with Brian, he was free to pursue another life after she died.
He was a nasty piece of work, and he was also coddled by all those around him.
The book also reveals a lot about Brian in the process. More than I think he intends.
It's worth a read. But again, he's not a nice man.

Sunday, April 7, 2024

Muad'Dib's real foil in Dune

In the book Dune, much has been made of the contrast between Paul Atriedes and Feyd-Rautha Harkonnen.

They are about the same age, and both are heralded as last generation products of the Bene Gesserit breeding program intended to bring the Kwitzatz Haderach, or a male Bene Gesserit who can take a “Truthsayer” drug, survive and see into their ancestral memories.

Paul can also, before he ingests any spice, peek through the time stream to catch glimpses of possible future.

In the novel Dune, there is no suggestion that Feyd-Rautha can do likewise.

Much has been made of the character Margot Fenring’s observation of the extreme possibilities in Feyd-Rautha. He survives a fight in the Harkonnen arena against an opponent who was not, as was the norm, drugged to the point of not being lucid enough to fight well.

“You know, when you think what this lad could’ve been with some other upbringing — with the Atriedes code to guide him, for example,” Hasimir Fenring says.

So the novel makes explicit, in the opening chapter of its second “book” section that Feyd-Rautha is the foil for Paul Atriedes.

It is so prevalent an image that it is listed as the second most recent examples of a narrative foil in its wikipedia entry.

“In Frank Herbert's 1965 science fiction novel Dune, Feyd-Rautha serves as the narrative foil to Paul Atreides. While both characters are heirs of powerful noble houses, feature in the plans of the Bene Gesserit, and have received extensive combat training, Paul is compassionate and wishes to avoid war while Feyd is portrayed as interested solely in the acquisition of power,” it says.

The entry’s definition is “a character who contrasts with another character, typically, a character who contrasts with the protagonist in order to better highlight or differentiate certain qualities of the protagonist. A foil to the protagonist may also be the antagonist of the plot.”

Feyd is not the main antagonist to Paul’s protagonist. But he is the last real obstacle to him attaining what he desires.

He is a classic foil, very much like Laertes in Hamlet. Laertes is Hamlet’s foil not so much because of how dissimilar he is to Hamlet, but because of their similarities. Both are noble. Laertes is a bit of a hot-head, which does contrast with Hamlet’s classic indecisiveness in the first half of the play. But they are both skilled fighters and are put up to a fencing duel which Hamlet doesn’t know is a plot by his villainous uncle to kill him – with a poisoned blade, no less.

Feyd is such a major foil for Paul that in his filmed adaptation of Dune, Denis Villeneuve pumps up the character of Feyd-Rautha.

To show how the two might be equals, Feyd-Rautha is shown taking and passing the classic humanity test of the gom jabbar.

(I tend to think that, having stated that Feyd is a bit of a masochist who is into pain, a test of administering pain might be too “blunt an instrument” to get the necessary read on whether Feyd-Rautha is a real human.)

He also has a line of dialogue that, depending on how you read it, suggests he might be able to see a bit through time. He says he has seen Margot Fenring before, that he “dreamed” of her. This calls back to Paul’s dreams of seeing Chani in his dreams long before he left Caladan.

Another read on the line of dialogue is that this is perhaps not the first night of Fenring’s seduction of Feyd and he’s remembering something he was told to forget.

It is significant a paralleling between the two that some have taken it to mean that Feyd was a potential Kwitzatz Haderach as well.

I think that argument fails when you take the totality of what Villeneuve says in both films.

The exchange and Feyd’s passing the gom jabbar test say his genes are about on par with Paul’s. His martial training puts him about on par with Paul as well.

But Feyd is completely lacking what Villeneuve said in the first film was a very important factor. Paul has TWO bloodlines that he is heir to. He is the son of a Duke and a Great House. But he is also the son of a Bene Gesserit Sister and has been training in Bene Gesserit techniques.

Feyd is lacking that.

In the novel, Paul is also getting a fine dose of ethical training from his interactions with Yueh and probably Gurney Halleck. He is also getting Mentat training from Thufir Hawat. Paul and Feyd aren’t that close in overall capability.

As much as it is very apparent that Feyd’s function in the story is to be the foil to Paul’s character, a good work of fiction doesn’t have to limit itself to just one.

In Julius Caesar, also by Shakespeare, Brutus is said to have two foils, Cassius and Marc Antony. Cassius is an ally of Brutus while Marc Antony is very much a rival and an antagonist.

And there’s a very interesting foil for Paul Atriedes lurking throughout the pages of Dune who does not get elaborated upon in this regard.

The foil would have to be someone with similar qualities to Paul, which are smarts, martial ability, a command presence.

The person who most aptly contrasts with Paul is not Feyd-Rautha, but Paul's father, Duke Leto.

Leto had a similar teacher to Paul in Thufir Hawat, who ended up serving House Atriedes for almost 60 years and through three generations from the Old Duke to Paul.

He is the one who gives Paul many of his lessons in leadership, sacrificing for one’s people, loyalty. And that “air of bravura” that Paul certainly inherits from his father, who got it from his father.

If you further compare the two, one notes that the Bene Gesserit chose to completely write off Duke Leto. He was beneath their notice.

“Not for the father,” the Reverend Mother Gaius Helen Mohiam says in the book about whether there was anything that could be done to save Leto. That has become, “For the father, nothing,” in movie parlance. He wasn’t worth the trouble.

Before Arrakis. But after, there was some rethinking of Leto in Bene Gesserit circles.

In an epigraph from “Muad’Dib, Family Commentaries,” the Princess Irulan writes, “You see him there — a man snared by Destiny, a lonely figure with his light dimmed behind the glory of his son. Still, one must ask: ‘What is the son but an extension of the father?’”

Paul is, in many ways, what Duke Leto made of him.

The Duke was written off by the Bene Gesserit, but they knew he was two generations removed from what they thought was the achievement of “Totality,” the Kwitzatz Haderach.

How far off was he?

I posit he would have passed the gom jabbar test.

An animal caught in a trap will eat off a limb in order to escape. But a human will remain in the trap, hoping to ensnare the hunter and therefore remove a threat to humankind. That is the essence of what they BG are looking for in the test.

And what was the move to Arrakis? Baron Harkonnen in the second chapter of the book calls Dune the biggest mantrap in history and says the Duke is walking right into it.

We know from subsequent chapters that, despite the Baron saying the Emperor’s involvement is a secret, Leto already knows the Emperor is in on it and will be sending Sardaukar. His only hope is to get five battalions of Fremen to join his forces before the Baron and the Emperor strike. It’s his plan.

But the main thought here is he knows there is a trap and he remains in it. He is hoping to ensnare the hunter and remove a threat to his kind.

His decision to go to Arrakis is the core of the humanity test in action. Not even a metaphorical situation with real but phantom pain administered. A real threat with real pain and real potential loss if he doesn’t pull it off.

There are some dark parts of the Duke’s character. He is fully willing to exploit the Fremen. He is taking a HUGE risk with his family members, and the lives of most of his retainers and military. He is not greedy for space bucks, but he is wanting to play the feudal game of thrones to its fullest. He might have been thinking of the throne as the end game.

But he is most adeptly contrasted with Paul in his actual loyalty to individuals that he has serving him. During the spice harvester tour, the Duke risks the lives of his entire entourage in order to save the spice harvester crew.

“Damn the spice, save the men,” is the classic line that defines Duke Leto more than any other. He is shown to have other little things that inspire loyalty in his men like that, but none more vivid. And that moment is enough to turn Liet Kynes from someone who is ordered to not help and to betray the Atriedes into an almost convert.

“I like this Duke.”

The final contrast comes later in the book. When Paul tricks the smugglers that Gurney is working with, he expresses regret that they cannot save the smugglers’ carryall..

“Your father would have been more concerned for the men he couldn’t save.”

Paul does explain that the smugglers were interlopers in Fremen land, and they aren’t Paul’s people. The Fremen now are.

But at another stage, the Duke agreed to let the smugglers operate so long as they paid proper "dues" and a proper cut for Imperial taxation was taken out of the bribe.

As Duke of Arrakis, the smugglers are not Fremen, but they are his responsibility. They are his people.

If you look at Feyd-Rautha you can come away making the mistake of thinking Paul is the actual hero of Dune instead of just the protagonist. Feyd bad, so Paul good.

But if you see Duke Leto as the other, more proper foil for Paul, to contrast Leto and Paul, you can clearly see that Paul is being set up as not the noble hero, but at the very least an anti-hero.

Leto good, Paul ... not so much.

Tuesday, May 2, 2023

Some good news

 I have had many people doing prayers to St. Joseph on my behalf, to aid me in my job search.

So I am happy to say that on day of the Catholic feast of St. Joseph the Worker, I have had the first conversation with my new employers. I have accepted a similar position to the one I left, and it's actually a return of sorts.

I will be doing sports page design for Lee Enterprises. It's a remote position.

It is a return because Lee Enterprises took over management of BH Media after I left, and then bought BH Media a short time after that.

So I will be dealing with the same BH Media footprint, plus additional Lee Enterprises properties.

When I left, there were a bunch of us who were telling BH Media they ought to offer remote work, but corporate thought it was inconceivable.

I don't know if it was my leaving in 2019 or some pandemic thing in 2020, but the Lee management company embraced the remote possibilities since, and most of their designers are remote.

It's not 100 percent official. I have to pass a drug test.

But I should start May 16.

Thanks to everyone who prayed or had good thoughts. It was most appreciated.

I was looking at a column I wrote for The Gamecock way back in 1989.

I wrote, in part, "I want to be a journalist –— for the rest of my life, I want to be a journalist. I want to write about sports and about government. I want to sit in the slot on the night desk and pound away at the wire copy coming in for tomorrow's bulldog edition."

That guy is still getting what he wants.

But things he could not foresee have changed the business. I am pretty positive this is my last newspaper job. So I am going to make the best of it.

I wish, however, I could go back and tell that kid in 1989 what's coming.

Thanks and love to all.

Saturday, March 25, 2023

Some bad news

Telling bad news is sometimes harder than the bad news itself. 
So I said in my bad day Facebook post about Wednesday, there were two things. 
Second, I detailed, was my car suddenly wouldn't start. My son and I went down a checklist of some things, for about 20 minutes, and got it to start. 
But the other thing happened first, and there's no 20-minute fix for it. 
It was inevitable, but still cuts to the quick. 
I was laid off from my job designing sports pages for Gannett newspapers on Wednesday. 
I had finished and was about to send my first Wednesday assignments to the press when I got a message to come to an "urgent" meeting. When I logged in to the meeting in Teams, there was my Team Manager and an HR-looking woman. 
When no one else seemed to be logging in for a group meeting, I knew what it was. 
Just last week, they changed — again — the way we were doing our assignments as a way to manage time and costs. Can't go in to details. But I was moving my pages faster than I had previously. 
My wife was working from home as well and was on a computer call herself. So I told her first. 
Told my son when he got home, and called my mother later in the evening. 
You tell the news, and then there is the pause, as it sinks in, as the person you told looks for something, the right thing, to say. 
There's a look, not quite blank, but empty, as if something is being sucked out of them, as they start hurting for you. 
And not wanting to do that any more, I had not told my sisters and brother or any extended family. Until this post.
Sorry to them. 
My wife, quoting a woman she works with, one who used to work at a big metro daily that is a shell of itself, said that she didn't leave newspapers. Newspapers left her. 
That's something I know. I have said variations of it to people I know who were getting out. 
She is usually right about such things, but it takes me a while to get around to agreeing. Usually. I do agree. She says I need to find something else to do. 
I know I need to. I just haven't got a clue what that ought to be. 
I have been a newspaper office drone since 2010. I've covered some big events as a freelance writer on certain occasions. Took a week to go the World Meeting of Families in Philly when Pope Francis came to the U.S., and also covered the 2012 Democratic National Convention in Charlotte. But jobs like that and stories like that were few and far between. 
I know so much of the newspaper profession these days is based in digital, rather than my forte, shoe leather. 
Newspapers like we used to have are going away. Far away. 
But we still need journalism in this society. Desperately need good journalism. 
And I think I have some stories yet to write. But don't know for whom I could. 
So my last hurrah in journalism will be a basically unseen design gig for a company that ... admits it wants to be digital. 
Thoughts and prayers will be greeted with thanks. All my best to you and yours.

Tuesday, October 18, 2022

Third Harris Award

Harris Award for Editorial Writing

Awarded in 2006

The judge looked at the three entries and wrote: "Short but witty, Enough info to inform, enough opinion to interest."

(I think the first one is the "witty" one.)

State school board 'don't' need this guy

The current fuss brewing at the state level is one of those in which the real issue is obscured by some huffing and puffing on what should be a minor side issue.

The Anderson County legislative delegation appointed a man to serve on the state Board of Education who has a checkered past in the area of race relations. He’s a member of a Confederate group some people question and once sold a textbook that tried subtle revisionism on the sensitive subject of the Holocaust.

He tried to downplay it, saying he wasn’t aware of everything in the textbook, then saying the questionable section was just in a few chapters and not the overall text. He sold the textbook to some private schools and to some parents homeschooling their children.

Because of a past some say is checkered, S.C. Education Superintendent Inez Tenenbaum says she wants to fight his appointment to the state board. The man wasn’t backed universally by the Anderson County delegation. He was appointed by a close, 4-3 vote.

Our country’s electorate is divided between two political extremes. At times, South Carolina can be divided in many ways, and the racial divide usually is one of the widest we must cross.

This man isn’t being elected to represent Chester County on the state board, but his vote and his voice will be one of many that sets education policy at a statewide level. Every resident of

South Carolina has a stake in each individual member of the state Board of Education because this board sets education policy for a state that isn’t doing the best possible job educating its young people. The Board of Education flies largely under most people’s notice, but it can have a vast effect at the right time.

The state Department of Education is currently running a South Carolina school district, the Allendale County District, partly because the state Board voted to declare an educational emergency in that district.

People are entitled to their opinions. We don’t think his are particularly helpful to our state, but we don’t condemn him as a potential member of the State Board because of the opinions he holds.

We think he is unfit for another reason. When this became a political flap, he told many reporters, according to the Associated Press, “Ain’t no one going to force me out.”

He doesn’t belong on the state Board of Education. He belongs back in school, where someone ought to teach him what a double negative is.

Dec. 15, 2004

Hog dogging? It's not a sport

It isn’t often that South Carolina is the tops of a national category. But given our druthers, we’d rather South Carolina in general and Chester County in specific not be tops in the dubious sport of “hog-dogging.”

Anybody who wants to hunt and raise their kids to lead a sportsman’s life has no problem with this newspaper.

But anyone who thinks that siccin’ one animal on another is a sport is missing something. A heart, probably. The animal fighting called “hog dogging” isn’t even a fair fight.

The most basic line of defense or attack for the boar, the tusks, the tusks of the boar, are whittled down or pulled out. The boar, by definition “feral” or wild, can’t defend itself as its natural instincts tell it to.

In that sense, it isn’t a sport. It’s more akin to watching the Harlem Globetrotters take on the Washington Generals. By definition, the Generals don’t have the skills to beat the Globetrotters and they lose. Every single time out, they lose.

So it’s an exhibition, if one wants to be so kind. But the Globetrotters just humiliate the Generals. The Generals don’t get bitten, don’t get knocked to the ground, don’t get their legs broken.

All such injuries were reportedly found on 15 wild hogs recovered from during a raid of a residence outside Fort Lawn.

We are making absolutely no comment about those arrested in relation to that raid. There are now four people charged with various crimes in connection with “hog-dogging” in Chester County. Law enforcement is working on the case, and at some point, it will take the evidence and present it to a jury of Chester County citizens, who will sooner or later decide if those arrested were indeed connected with this and if any possible connection is a crime.

No, we’re just talking about this, and other kinds of animal “fighting,” and we want to be clear from the outset.

This isn’t a sport. It’s a barbaric practice done by people who think that animals are just “critters.” They think that the animals they use to slake their own blood thirst have no soul and feel no pain. Most often, the reverse is true.

We are judged on how we treat those least able to protect themselves. Pitting animals against each other for sport isn’t a sport. It’s cruel.

Those who violently treat animals are more prone to violence, some studies have shown. They are deadened to the impact of violence.

There’s a special place in hell for people who mistreat animals.

Dec. 29, 2004

Why didn’t council hire locally for suit?

We’re scratching our heads over Chester County’s recent actions in the drawn-out legal battle over the referendum on the form of government.

County Attorney Joan E. Winters said at the beginning of the process — and other county officials have reiterated throughout the process — that this is not a confrontational process, per se. The county is merely asking the court for guidance on what seems to be a difficult issue.

But the suit asking for a declaratory judgment filed by Winters is framed in an adversarial way.

It says on its face, Chester County versus the county Election Commission. Its pleadings take issue with commission actions, and it asks the court to overturn the commission’s actions and throw out the referendum.

The suit and a related filing have been delayed because the commission didn’t have a lawyer.

Winters said from the outset she could not represent both the commission and the council. Her primary client most days is Chester County Council, and that is who she is representing.

There is nothing wrong with that, but more should have been done, earlier on, to secure a lawyer for the commission. The S.C. Attorney General’s office told the paper of a similar case, which suggests the commission should pick a lawyer and submit the bill to the council.

Before that opinion was sought, however, the council somehow got the idea it was entitled to do more than just pay the bill. Councilmen got the idea they ought to pick the lawyer for the commission, even though they are suing the commission.

When the commission finally got around to shopping around for an attorney, it found an election law expert from Columbia it wanted to hire.

The council balked at the price, and one member went so far as to suggest the county should hire someone “local” to represent the commission.

The council had several meetings behind closed doors before it finally came up with a lawyer — a local one — for the commission.

The average member of the public must think it odd the council thinks it has the right to pick the attorney for the commission. Only one councilman said the commission should hire its own lawyer.

The commission said no, and it intends to use the lawyer it wanted back in May.

The case, now in its fifth month without a reply from the commission, is complex. The county’s legal team decided to get some help.

Since the commission rejected the lawyer picked by the council, he was obviously available, and he obviously fit the council’s price range. So did the council, in hiring a lawyer to help Winters, stick to the criteria it used in picking a lawyer for the commission?

No.

Councilmen hired a retired judge from Lancaster County. He isn’t local, and he isn’t cheap. Seems the council is saying, “Do as I say, not as I do.”

Aug. 17, 2005, The News & Reporter

Friday, October 14, 2022

CNI Editorial Writing Award Award

 


1999

EDITORIAL  

Voters, not school board, should reject candidacy


Make no mistake about it, this newspaper is opposed to Charlie Cave's attempt to seek re-election to the Allendale County School Board.

We wish he weren't running. The fact that he is running means he still has not accepted responsibility for what he did.

By his own admission, he pulled out a knife while on school grounds, while at a school function. His quibbling over the length of the blade is just that. He violated the Safe Schools Act, which he as a school board member had a duty to enforce.

The Board's right to remove him from office has been upheld, and a Circuit Court judge ruled that Charlie Cave's actions on that fateful night in December, 1996 "rose to the level of misconduct in office."

He is still facing criminal prosecution, including a weapons charge and an assault charge.

He has absolutely no moral ground on which to stand, and anyone who votes for him also lacks moral standing. To vote for Charlie Cave will be to say you don't care about safe schools.

Someone else, anyone else from that district should step up and run for the seat.

But make no mistake about it, this newspaper is completely against the Allendale School Board's decision to fight Cave's re-election by any and all means.

This school board had the right to remove him from the board. It does not have any right to get involved in the political process. Right now, all Charlie Cave has done is file to run in a Democratic Party primary.

Since no one filed to run as a Republican or as an independent candidate, the election will be decided in the political primary.

We agree with the school board that Cave is unfit for this office. If he runs, the voters should vote to keep him out. We think if the voters put him back in office, then the School Board should once more remove him from office.

But we do not think that ANY governmental body or agency should start trying to control any election. That is absolutely not the way that things are done in the United States of America.

The School Board barely had enough members present last week to hold a meeting, and the vote to proceed with preventing Cave's election was divided, 2-1. If the other member had been present, it probably still would have been a successful vote. But the two members who voted to go ahead with this action have cast a vote for what can only be called repression. The government is trying to control an election.

We urge the school board to call an immediate meeting, reconsider this vote, and put faith in the voters of Allendale County. If the voters of his district want Charlie Cave to represent them, then they have to right to cast their votes for him without any government telling them otherwise.

If a government agency limits the choices we can make in an election, then it is controlling that election.

We cannot say it loud enough.

No.

Not here, not ever.


Judges' comments for CNI's Better Newspaper Contest Friday, July 30, 1999 Amicalola Falls State Park
Best Editorial Writing

First place: Stephen Guilfoyle, The Allendale County Citizen Leader: "Voters, not school board, should reject candidacy." From the first sentence, this editorial writer takes a strong position and continues to hold his ground throughout. You never doubt where the writer stands, and you can't help but read on after the first enticing paragraphs. The editorial contains enough background to fill in new readers and refresh familiar ones. The writer makes several points sure to make the reader ponder the issues involved. He is also brave enough to stand for democratic principles even when that stance probably won't sit well with some readers. I'm now curious as to how this whole process worked out. Well done.

The judge mentioned six "other notables (no awards given):" School board lawyer delays Cave indictment," The Allendale County Citizen Leader; and "Secrecy subverts justice," The People-Sentinel, were among them. I wrote those as well.

Thursday, September 8, 2022

 This article appeared in The Catholic News Herald Sept. 1, 2022

Getting Closer to God

Two Scouts tell of their their memorable St. George Trek

By Stephen Guilfoyle

Two Boy Scouts from the Diocese of Charlotte took a long hike this summer through “God’s country.”

Caleb Laney and Joseph Wood were among 70 Catholic Scouts from across the U.S. who tackled the St. George Trek at Philmont Scout Ranch in July.

A 140,000-acre ranch in Cimarron, New Mexico, Philmont is home to the Boy Scouts of America’s premier high adventure camp. Each year, thousands of Scouts venture there for two-week hikes – backpacking 5 to 12 miles a day through isolated wilderness in New Mexico’s Sangre de Cristo Range of the Rocky Mountains at elevations of 6,500 to 12,500 feet, well into the range where altitude sickness kicks in.

The St. George Trek – named for the patron saint of Scouting – is a Philmont adventure designed for older Catholic Scouts who want to deepen their faith while taking on physical challenges. Held every two years, the trek layers on daily Mass, prayer, reflections and deep conversation about life’s purpose to all that Philmont offers.

“The primary goal of the St. George Trek,” Father Mike Santangelo tells folks as trek director, “is to provide participants with an opportunity to consider where God may be calling them.”

At the end of the 11-day challenge, Scouts commit to further discerning their life’s vocation and staying involved in the Church.

Caleb and Joseph were selected to represent the Diocese of Charlotte on the St. George Trek by the Charlotte Diocese Catholic Committee on Scouting.

On July 6, the two Scouts flew 1,500 miles from Charlotte to Albuquerque. They were assigned to different crews when they arrived: Caleb to Crew 1 and Joseph to Crew 3. The 12- to 13-member crews spent the next day getting to know each other, planning and packing, and beginning their reflections and attendance at daily Mass. On July 8, they boarded buses for the Philmont ranch.

Caleb and Joseph’s crews were supposed to hike different paths, meet on Day 6 for a retreat, then hike a few more days back to pick-up points. But not everything went according to plan.

CALEB’S TREK

Like many Boy Scouts, Caleb Laney, 17, wanted to test himself against the rigors of Philmont, but he also wanted more.

Caleb lives in Peachland, population 380, where the closest Boy Scout troop is 589, chartered by Pleasant Hill United Methodist Church in the even smaller town of McFarlan. Both towns are in rural Anson County, 40 miles east of Charlotte. He and his family attend Our Lady of Lourdes Church in Monroe.

Caleb and his sister are the only Catholic students in their high school, he said.

Going on the St. George Trek, Caleb hoped to be around “more Catholics and be around more people my age.”

He was happy to join a dozen Catholic Scouts in Crew 1 – just what he’d hoped for.

On Day 1, Caleb’s crew embarked on the trail to Lovers Leap, then went on to hike around Crater Lake to Miners Park for rock climbing. On Day 3, it was up Black Mountain for black powder rifle shooting, then a Day 4 stop at Cypher’s Mine, where gold had once been discovered and ghosts were said to remain.

Beyond the physical challenges of Philmont, the crews had Mass every day, with opportunities for penance and reconciliation. Two adults – one a priest – hiked with each crew.

Daily Mass “was new to me,” Caleb said. “It was nice, though. A nice quiet part of the day.”

Mass wasn’t at a set time, he said. “It depended on what we wanted to do. If we wanted to go to a peak – say, ‘Let’s have Mass on the peak,’ we’d do that. Or if we wanted to have it around lunch, we’d do that.”

SKIES OPEN UP

On the fifth day, Caleb’s crew began Mass atop Black Mountain, a dominant feature on the Philmont landscape. Then it started to hail.

A hailstorm was no problem for the Scouts, though – they used their ponchos to shield the priest and makeshift altar.

“After the Mass, we got under some trees. Lightning moved in for about 40 minutes,” he said. “After that we had to boogie down the mountain.”

The crew then pressed on for Cimarroncito, a camp area that also features a little covered chapel and outdoor benches, for a mid-trek retreat.

But on Day 6, COVID-19 struck. Someone tested positive and Caleb’s crew was dispatched to Philmont’s quarantine camp.

“We were ‘unclean,’” Caleb joked.

The commissary brought his crew meals each day. The Scouts could venture out for day hikes but had to return to “Quarantine Camp” each night.

Their first day there, it hailed again. They ended up spending the day in their tents.

Yet the Scouts soon made the best of the unexpected situation – setting their sights on climbing the Tooth of Time.

The intimidating rock outcrop along the Santa Fe Trail juts upward 9,003 feet. With a sheer rock face, it has become Philmont’s most recognizable symbol, named for its tooth-like shape and its signal to traders heading west in the 1800s that Santa Fe was only seven days away.

As the Scouts set out for the hike, the day began with clear skies. A crewmate caught a photo of Caleb greeting the morning sun with outstretched arms.

The crew decided to have their final Sunday Mass atop the Tooth of Time.

Caleb appreciated that the St. George Trek didn’t prioritize the religious aspect over the Philmont part, or vice versa. To him, both were important.

“It definitely made me more confident to be around other people my age who are Catholic,” he said. “I absolutely loved being able to have a spiritual journey and have a journey through God’s country.”

JOSEPH’S TREK

At 15, Joseph Wood’s journey began not in a tiny town but in Troop 8 – the largest Catholic troop in one of the largest Catholic parishes in the nation: St. Matthew.

Troop 8 goes on Philmont treks every two years, but Joseph recognized the St. George Trek, with its Catholic component, offered something different.

The longest Joseph had hiked before Philmont was a “shakedown” trek he and Caleb did together on Crowders Mountain in Gaston County, a 10-mile overnight dress rehearsal with full pack and gear to prepare for the St. George Trek.

“At Philmont, it was 50, 60, 70 miles” over the course of 12 days, he recalled.

He knows that because his crew leader’s fitness tracker helped chart their distance, recording 14 miles one day, until it ran out of power and the boys had to switch to rough estimates using maps.

Facebook posts also tracked Joseph’s journey. On July 13, photos show Crew 3 reaching Hunting Lodge Camp, a clearing in the woods with an historic log cabin.

The Scouts are wearing jackets and look considerably grimier than in the fresh-faced photos from their arrival.

Joseph’s crew also embraced daily Mass during their trek, participating in the sacrament of penance, talks and reflections. On July 15, Crew 3 reached Cimarroncito. There Joseph and his crewmates attended Mass with Bishop R. Daniel Conlon, the U.S. bishops’ liaison to the National Catholic Committee on Scouting.

Talks from seminarians, conversion stories, and discussions about the lives of saints made the daylong retreat a reflective time, Joseph said.

The break wasn’t all reflection, however. Crews 2 and 3 also undertook a service project while at Cimarroncito, helping clean up a small part of the nearby “burn scar,” where 27,000 acres had been damaged in a 2018 wildfire.

MIND, BODY AND SOUL

Joseph appreciated the break in the middle from the exhausting trek.

Hiking at a high elevation on the third day, he recalled, “I was having a hard time. My pack was heavy.”

But on Day 6, at retreat, the Scouts rested “mind, body and soul,” Joseph said. After that, “I was ready to do the next half, feeling nice and refreshed.”

The St. George Trek “was more than what I thought it would be,” he said. “I didn’t realize there would be talks; I didn’t know there would be Mass, not every day. I didn’t know how into the faith it was going to be. I was pleasantly surprised by that.”

Doing the trek and absorbing the seminarians’ vocation stories, Joseph began to think about what his own vocation might be.

“They asked, ‘What are you called to do? What do you think God is calling you to?’”

Joseph said he prayed a rosary one night while thinking about those questions.

“While you are out in the backcountry, hiking, you have a lot of time to yourself, thinking …” he said. “I need to pray about it more and ask God what He wants me to do.”

“Philmont, it’s a great experience,” he added. “It’s hard…You learn about yourself. And if you do the St. George Trek, you learn even more about yourself.”

Scouts: Explore your faith

The Charlotte Diocese Catholic Committee on Scouting selects two Scouts for the St. George Trek, which happens every two years at Philmont Scout Ranch in New Mexico.

The committee covers the registration fee of $925 per person, and families cover travel costs proper hiking gear.

Committee chairman Mike Nielsen encourages more Scouts to apply: “It is a unique opportunity for Scouts to spend nearly two weeks in the backcountry of Philmont Scout Ranch with priests, deacons and seminarians – not only enjoying the beauty and majesty of nature but also exploring their faith, values, morality, spirituality and vocations as young Catholic men and women with fellow Scouts from all over the U.S.”


Caleb Laney

090122 laneyAge: 17

Home: Peachland

Home Church: Our Lady of Lourdes, Monroe

Troop: 589

Chartered by: Pleasant Hill United Methodist Church, McFarlan

Scout Rank: Eagle

Scouting positions of note: Chaplain’s Aide, Senior Patrol Leader

Catholic Scouting awards:

Parvuli Dei (Cub Scouts)


Joseph Wood

Age: 15

Home: Charlotte

Home Church: St. Vincent de Paul, Charlotte

Troop: 8

Chartered by: St. Matthew

Scout Rank: Life

Scouting positions of note: Chaplain’s Aide, Patrol Leader

Catholic Scouting Awards:

Parvuli Dei (Cub Scouts); Ad Altare Dei (Boy Scouts)